🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, further states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.